Integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into autonomous weapons systems is happening at a fast pace and so are the emerging challenges for global communities. The behavior of AI systems in complex, dynamic environments might be less predictable, potentially leading to escalations or misinterpretations during conflicts. Major powers like the US, China, and Russia are actively developing AI for military applications and other Countries like Israel, South Korea, and the UK also investing heavily.

The rapid evolution of AI technology provides nations with the incentive to integrate these advancements into their military capabilities to maintain or gain strategic advantages. Countries are motivated by the desire to deter potential threats from adversaries who might be developing their own AI weapons. This fear of falling behind can accelerate development.

AI can be everywhere, from Drones to unmanned ground vehicles to naval systems that can operate with little to no human intervention or can making decisions on -the-fly in combat situations. It can process vast amounts of data from various sensors to provide better strategic and tactical decision-making, potentially leading to quicker, more precise targeting. It can plan to conduct or defend cyber warfare or can conduct coordinated actions among large numbers of small drones or robots and can overwhelm defenses through sheer numbers and coordinated tactics.

Machines lack the nuanced understanding of human ethics, culture, and the context of conflict, potentially leading to inappropriate use of force. AI systems might make decisions about targeting and engagement without human intervention, raising questions about accountability and morality. Who is responsible if an AI makes an erroneous decision leading to civilian casualties. It is possible that AI systems might behave in ways not fully anticipated by their human creators, especially in the chaotic environment of warfare, potentially leading to unintended escalations.Countries might engage in an arms race to develop more advanced AI-driven weapons systems, potentially destabilizing global security. As AI technology becomes more accessible, there’s a risk that non-state actors, including terrorist groups, could develop or acquire autonomous weapons.

Autonomous weapons could be vulnerable to hacking, leading to unauthorized use or manipulation of these systems. Bugs or unforeseen software errors could result in unintended actions, including targeting errors or failures to recognize non-combatants. Current international laws and treaties, like the Geneva Conventions, were not designed for autonomous weapons. There’s a debate on how these systems comply with principles of distinction, proportionality, and military necessity. Establishing legal responsibility for actions taken by AI systems remains complex. If an autonomous weapon commits a war crime, who should be held accountable?

AI arms race is not just about the technology itself but also about the geopolitical strategy, ethical considerations, and the future of warfare. The nature of warfare could shift, potentially making conflict more impersonal and reducing the human cost perceived by the attacker, which might lower the threshold for engaging in conflict. The use of AI in combat might further desensitize society to the realities of war due to reduced direct human involvement.

Problem is more complex in case of Generative AI, where Software is assessing the situations and updating its codes. Who will keep a check on Algorithm and is human mind capable of keeping pace with speed of execution by AI. World need to have a new international treaties for addressing the challenges of AI in 21st century. Their has to be a Global consensus on Developing standards for transparency in AI military applications, ensuring human oversight, and establishing clear lines of accountability. Civil Society and Policy makers need to talk about regulating AI usage in lethal weapons, that has the potential to impact humanity.

Galactik Views