Nuclear Power Capacity Addition Requires Significant Investment: IAEA Report

Large-scale infrastructure projects involving nuclear power have comparable financial and economic aspects to those involving other forms of energy production, but their project lifetimes are far longer. A new nuclear power plant can have an economic cycle that lasts more than a century, covering early planning and development, building, commercial operation, and decommissioning

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) 2024 Climate Change and Nuclear Power study has been recently released. Report emphasises the necessity of a large increase in investment in order to meet targets for growing nuclear power. The report looks on measures to make private sector financing accessible.

Numerous large-scale, expensive infrastructure projects share similarities with nuclear energy projects. Nonetheless, investments in nuclear energy are also associated with a unique set of factors and hazards that affect capital costs. Nuclear energy projects have a complicated risk profile that calls for careful risk management due to their lengthy construction timetables, intricate regulatory frameworks, extended payback periods, and long debt tenors.

Building prices for new NPPs are very project-specific and fluctuate greatly between nations, reflecting disparities in recent plant building experiences as well as variations in technology, labour costs, project scope, and finance systems.

Large-scale infrastructure projects involving nuclear power have comparable financial and economic aspects to those involving other forms of energy production, but their project lifetimes are far longer. A new nuclear power plant can have an economic cycle that lasts more than a century, covering early planning and development, building, commercial operation, and decommissioning. New nuclear projects need a large initial investment, which is committed for a number of years before the facility is operating and begins to provide income. Although not included in this paper, funding nuclear programs can have a significant positive macroeconomic impact and influence investment choices.

Capital expenses and the cost of capital are the two primary factors that determine a capital-intensive investment’s project viability and financial sustainability, such nuclear power. All of the expenditures related to building nuclear power plants, such as labour, plant supplies, and expert services, are included in capital costs. The needed rate of return that lenders and investors need to see in order for them to put money into the project is reflected in the cost of capital. It encompasses elements that shape the finance environment and impact investment choices in the nuclear energy industry, including inflation, risk premiums, and opportunity costs.

The paper states that in order to fulfil the IAEA’s high case prediction for nuclear capacity in 2050, worldwide investment in nuclear energy needs rise to 125 billion USD year, up from the approximately 50 billion USD invested annually between 2017 and 2023. More than 20 nations committed to work towards the more ambitious target of doubling capacity at COP28 last year, which would need yearly investments of up to USD 150 billion.

For the first projects in the EU, UK, and USA after many years, reported capital costs (excluding finance expenses) vary from US $8 000 to US $11,000 per kW or more. According to reports, the capital expenses of recent new construction in China, the Republic of Korea, and the Russian Federation are more in line with US $2500–5000/kW. The International Energy Agency (IEA) forecasts that China and India will be able to provide nuclear plants for less than US $3000/kW, while new build prices in the USA and the EU may drop to about $4500/kW by 2050.

For nations looking to provide clean, dependable baseload electricity to fulfil their growing energy demands, nuclear power presents a feasible option. Nuclear power introduction, however, is fraught with difficulties, including expensive capital needs, stringent safety regulations, and technological complexity. Strict safety regulations and strong non-proliferation measures for the production of civil nuclear power, the creation of a long-term plan for the safe and secure management of radioactive waste, and major upgrades to the current electrical grid to support the NPP’s large capacity will all help ensure the project’s successful implementation.

Galactik Views

Related articles