The European Commission fined Apple €500 million and Meta €200 million for violating the Digital Markets Act (DMA), marking the first penalties under this legislation effective since March 2024. Apple was penalized for restricting app developers from informing users about alternative purchasing options outside the App Store, breaching the DMA’s anti-steering rules. Meta was fined for its “pay or consent” model on Facebook and Instagram, which forced users to either allow personal data use for targeted ads or pay for an ad-free experience, violating the DMA’s requirement for a less data-intensive service option. Both companies face a 60-day compliance deadline, with further fines possible for non-compliance. Apple and Meta plan to appeal, arguing the Commission unfairly targets them and that the rulings harm user privacy and business models.
Tech companies are increasingly concerned about the European Union’s Digital Markets Act (DMA), which imposes strict regulations on large digital platforms designated as “gatekeepers.” The DMA, effective since March 2024, aims to curb anti-competitive practices, promote fair competition, and enhance consumer choice. EU is primarily applies to a handful of U.S.-based tech giants. This perception is heightened by the European Commission’s aggressive enforcement, including dawn raids and iterative investigations.
DMA mandates gatekeepers like Apple, Meta, Google, Amazon, and Microsoft to allow third-party app stores, permit alternative payment systems, ensure interoperability, and avoid self-preferencing. Non-compliance risks fines up to 10% of global annual turnover (or 20% for repeat offenses), as seen with Apple’s €500 million and Meta’s €200 million fines.
The threat of hefty fines and ongoing investigations (e.g., into Apple, Meta, and Google) creates uncertainty. Appeals, like those planned by Apple and Meta, are costly and may not overturn rulings, while non-compliance could lead to further penalties or structural remedies like business breakups. DMA rules, such as mandating third-party access to services, could stifle innovation or compromise user privacy. It has set a benchmark for global regulation, with similar laws emerging in the UK, Japan, and India. This amplifies compliance costs and complexity for tech giants operating across jurisdictions.
Europe is struggle to build large tech companies comparable to U.S. or Chinese giants like Apple, Google, or Tencent.
Europe’s business culture often prioritizes stability over disruption. Unlike the U.S., where failure is seen as a learning step, European entrepreneurs face greater stigma for failed ventures, discouraging bold risk-taking. Europe has tech hubs like London, Berlin, and Stockholm, but they lack the interconnected networks of universities, investors, and corporations found in Silicon Valley. This limits mentorship, collaboration, and scaling opportunities. Europe excels in traditional industries like automotive (e.g., Volkswagen) and finance, where it has global leaders. Investment and talent have historically flowed to these sectors rather than tech, slowing digital innovation.
Despite this, Europe has produced notable tech firms like Spotify, ASML, and SAP, and its startup scene is growing, with €45 billion in VC funding in 2023. However, to rival U.S. or Chinese giants, Europe needs unified markets, bolder VC strategies, and policies balancing regulation with innovation.
While the EU’s Digital Markets Act and GDPR aim to protect consumers, their strict rules can burden startups with compliance costs, deterring innovation. Large U.S. firms can absorb these costs, but smaller European players struggle and find the growth stifling.
Galactik Views